The to Kashmir – Dr.Subramanian Swamy
Date:   Wed 03/13/13 11:01 PM
Name Type Save View
Part 1   text/plain Save  
Part 2   text/html Save  

Sent from my iPad

The to Kashmir – Dr.Subramanian Swamy


I believe that the Kashmir “issue” can no more be solved by dialogue

either with the Pakistanis or the Hurriyat. This is because the

Pakistan army has now a majority of Captains and Colonels owing

allegiance to the Taliban. In another five years, they will reach, by

promotions, the Corps Commander level. We know that the Government in

Pakistan is controlled by the seven Corps Commanders of the Army.

Therefore, a Taliban Government in Pakistan is inevitable; and a Jihad

against Hindustan the logical consequence. In turn, the Hurriyat is an

organization that cannot go against Pakistan.


So, Hindustan has about five years to prepare for a decisive and

defining War with Pakistan, and we must prepare to win it. We,

therefore, have to throw out of office in the coming elections all

those Hindustani politicians who crave or preen themselves on being

popular in Pakistan by sounding reasonable and Secular, as also

equivocating on every issue. For the survival of the ancient

civilization of Hindustan, we have to win that inevitable War and

recover the whole of Kashmir.


I will not blame the Jihadis for the coming War. They are, after all,

programmed for that Way by Islamic theology. I will blame ourselves

for not understanding the fundamentals of Islam as propounded in the

Sira and the Hadith. It teaches that if Muslims are in a majority,

they must rule (Darul Islam), and then everyone else is a dhimmi and a

kafir, who do not have equal rights of worship. Thus, in Saudi Arabia,

you cannot even display a picture of a Hindu God inside your own home!

When Muslims are in a hopeless minority, then Sira and Hadith urge

Muslims to make a deal with the majority and make no demands (Darul

Ahad). In the US and Australia, for example, Muslims will, therefore,

never ask for separate Shariat personal law. If Muslims are not

hopelessly in a minority, Islam directs that true Muslims conduct

subversions and act against all human values to leverage their

position (Darul Harab) to become of defining influence in the polity,

and ultimately become rulers. We saw this in Kashmir recently when the

Government was made to cave in on the most humane gesture of allotting

land to make Hindu pilgrims feel comfortable while on arduous journey

to the Amarnath caves. And we have it on the authority of the Chief

Minister of the State that the agitation against the allotment was

financed by Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.


It is foolish, therefore, in the face of this reality to expound the

banal sentiment that “all Muslims are not terrorists or fanatics”. Of

course, that is true. Or that Koran is a message of peace. May be it

is. However, the Islam of the cutting edge of Muslim thought

propounded by leaders such as Osama Bin Laden is in Sira and Hadith,

which calls on the faithful to wage war against the infidels who

cannot strike back effectively and crush them.


The struggle for Kashmir by the Jihadis thus is not just for

Independence. They, instead, want a Darul Islam there and for the

State to become a part of the Caliphate. Hindus are a special target

because despite Iran, Iraq, Egypt and other countries becoming

majority Muslim after less than two decades of conquest and

brutalization, Hindusthan after a thousand years of massacres, mayhem

and rape remained dominantly Hindu. This is a living affront for the

fundamentalist Muslim, and in their seminaries and madrassas in Iran

and Saudi Arabia, they even today debate and agonize over it.


Contrary to the British imperialist propaganda, the Hindus did not

just lie down and be conquered by foreign invaders. The Hindu fighting

spirit had never dimmed, even if weakened, by traitors within.

Periodically, the Hindus rose in revolt symbolized by the

Vijayanagaram Empire (which lasted 300 years), or in Shivaji’s

bravery, or Guru Gobind Singh’s campaigns, or the Maratha national



Most of us thus remained Hindus, defiant, even if in poverty and

misery, singing Vande Mataram. This is the true history of Hindusthan

which the fundamentalist Muslim and the British imperialist historians

cannot bear to acknowledge.


Accommodation and compromise with Islamic terrorists is self-defeating

and suicidal. We have, instead, to fight back, for which Kashmir is

the starting point. Hindu renaissance, long overdue, will be nurtured

if we look for an opportunity to seize back the occupied areas of

Kashmir, and make the Jihadis feel that in Hindusthan there can only

be Darul Ahad for Muslims. We had opportunities earlier to demonstrate

that, for example, in 1948, 1971, 1999, and 2001. But we let it go.


So, let there be no more intellectual confusion about the identity of

Hindusthan as a Hindu Rashtra (Nation), which means a land of Hindus

and those others who acknowledge proudly that their ancestors are

Hindus. If Muslims acknowledge this truth, then they are welcome as a

part of our family. And those who do not so acknowledge, cannot be

equal citizens in Hindusthan. Therefore, we shall not agree to any

more truncation of Hindusthani territory.


We have to, therefore, disown UN Resolutions and Hindustan-Pakistan

Treaties, such as signed in Simla in 1972, as unauthorized Nehruvian

policy blunders. The legality of the Instrument of Accession signed in

favour of Hindusthan by the then Maharaja of J&K on October 26, 1947

has to prevail. Otherwise, it will create a plethora of legal issues,

including what will become the status of the Maharaja if we abrogate

this Instrument. Will Dr. Karan Singh, the son of Maharaja Hari Singh,

have then a claim to be regarded again as an independent and sovereign

King of J&K? In the Junagadh issue, Pakistan had held the Instrument

once signed is “final, irrevocable, and not requiring the wishes of

the people to be ascertained”. That is the correct position. But the

Junagadh Nawab after signing the Instrument in favour of Pakistan,

invaded the neighbouring princely states, states which had acceded to

Hindusthan. So when the Hindusthani Army was moved by Patel to defend

these areas, the Nawab ran away to Pakistan. His subjects were mostly

Hindu, who then welcomed the Hindusthani army.


Furthermore, on what legal basis, can we now seek to ascertain the

wishes of the people of J&K when the India Independence Act of 1947,

passed by the British Parliament, makes no provision for the same?

After all, it was this same Act which created a legal entity called

Pakistan, carved out from the united Hindusthan. Hindusthan, under the

Act, was a settled and continuing entity, out of which the British

Parliament made a new entity called Pakistan. Never in previous

history there was ever a country called Pakistan. The concept itself

was formulated only in 1947.


By what mechanism can then Pakistan today seek to amend, or even

de-recognise, the Act, without unwittingly undermining the legal

status of Pakistan itself? That is, if the Instrument of Accession is

called into question, will not the Partition itself be subject to

challenge, as without legal basis on the same consideration? I raise

this question also because in the case of Beruberi in Eastern

Hindusthan, the transfer of that area to Bangla Desh although agreed

to, has been enmeshed in prolonged litigation in the Hindusthani

Supreme Court because of Article 1 of the Hindusthani Constitution

which bars de-merger of any Hindusthani territory after 1950.


Hindusthani Army Jawans created Bangla Desh out of Pakistan. But

despite that, and drunk with their Darul Islam status, the Bengali

Muslims have not only driven out the Hindus, or butchered them, or

forcibly converted them, but millions of Bengali Muslims have sneaked

into Hindusthan and are happily working with Hindus in Hindusthan. The

Partition was agreed to by Hindus only for those Muslims who could not

bear to live under Hindu hegemony. And, after getting their territory,

they cannot now say that they are happy to live in Hindusthan with the



Therefore, a virat Hindu Rashtra (Nation) should tell Bangla Desh to

take back their Muslims, or hand over one-third of Bangla Desh

territory as compensation. If they do not agree, then we must send two

divisions of the Hindustani Army from Sylhet to Khulna, and annex

one-third of north Bangla Desh as our due, for bearing the economic

and political burden of Bangla Deshis in our country. This will make

our access to Assam and the North-East much easier too. But, more

strategically, it will send a powerful and salutary signal to

Pakistani terrorists that Hindus will no more be passive.


These actions are possible if we gear up diplomatically for it. Today,

the world is sick of the terrorism and the greed of Muslims nations to

make money out of the sale of oil which they have got by sheer

accident of geology. Therefore, we must make strong allies. Israel is

one such country. We must find ways to make China see our interests.

It can be done if we know how to come to an understanding with them.

This is essential for isolating Pakistan. At present, China has begun

to see the tinder box that Pakistan has become. Uighurs from Xinjiang

have been to madrassas of Pakistan for training in subversion in

Urumuchi and to sabotage the Beijing Olympics This worries China. It

should concern us, too.


Therefore, to lay the foundation for the liberation of Kashmir, we

must have President’s Rule for some time. Hindustan should refuse to

engage in any dialogue on Kashmir in which the other side does not

accept the whole of Kashmir as an integral and inalienable part of

Hindustan. The people of Kashmir should be left in no doubt in their

minds where the citizens of Hindu Rashtra stand on the future of the

state: that it lies with us. Every Hindu has a claim on Kashmir. I,

for one, claim it because my Gotra (lineage, clan) is Kashyapa. It was

Rishi Kashyapa who invented Kashmir out of the Dal Lake. Hence, my



We should undo the “cleansing” of the state of Kashmiri Hindu Pandits

by sending 1 million ex-servicemen and families into the Kashmir

Valley for re-settlement. Article 370 of the Constitution will have to

be removed for that purpose; but according to the Constitution itself,

it is supposed to be a “temporary provision” not requiring a

Parliamentary two-thirds majority for amendment. It can be erased by a

Presidential Notification on the recommendation of the Union Cabinet.


Then, we await a War. We do not have to go to War with Pakistan on

Kashmir because a Talibanised Pakistan will provide us with the

opportunity. What I am advocating here is that we prepare mentally and

militarily for that eventuality, and having been provided that

opportunity, go for the jackpot — to use an American slang.



  Subramanian Swamy





Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s